---
product_id: 130415383
title: "I Was Anastasia"
price: "NT$760"
currency: TWD
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 10
url: https://www.desertcart.tw/products/130415383-i-was-anastasia
store_origin: TW
region: Taiwan
---

# I Was Anastasia

**Price:** NT$760
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** I Was Anastasia
- **How much does it cost?** NT$760 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.tw](https://www.desertcart.tw/products/130415383-i-was-anastasia)

## Best For

- Customers looking for quality international products

## Why This Product

- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

desertcart.com: I Was Anastasia: 9781101973318: Lawhon, Ariel: Books

Review: Very Intriguing! - I loved the Frozen River so I had to check out more by Ariel Lawton… the author felt called to write this book & that makes it extra special. I appreciate all of the research & intention that went in to formulating the dual timelines. Anna’s going backward & Anastasia's going forward until the end. It was a unique way to tell the story & executed well. I read this in a review before I dove in but I 100% agree… Even if you know how the real life story ends, you really can’t predict how this book ends…It makes you ask questions the whole way through & even after you are done reading, it gives you a new perspective. There are many curiosities we may never know the full answer to but this book gives you a lot to think about. Hang tight & don’t spoil the ending!
Review: No Spoiler Alert Needed - I considered beginning this review with a spoiler alert, but after brief consideration realized that really, none is needed. The logical base for this novel - those Tsar-struck and Romanov groupies among us - know the story well, and, unless one was hiding out in the Lost City of Z for most of the 20th century, there is no way the non-Russophile wouldn't know the tale, either. I am not a fan of fiction - especially historical fiction, where a character-creating author attempts to give speech to people who actually existed, complete with their own speech - so I was prepared to dislike this book (one of the reasons I, one of those aforementioned Romanov groupies, passed over it in the bookstore and bought it used on desertcart). We all know, and have for years, that DNA proved Anna Anderson was not the Grand Duchess. So what could this book present that was at all new and interesting? I began it with pad and paper at hand the moment the Anna character (written in the third person - except for the prologue and afterword - and regressing in time) is defined as being "in her seventies" in 1968. Anastasia would still have been in her 60s. The fact that Anderson is in her seventies is mentioned about three times. I then noticed that the Anastasia portion (written in the first person, normal time sequence) mentions her age a few times - and it is correct. So, was the Anna portion in error, or a subtle way of already letting us know they aren't the same person, almost from the first page? I'm not sure. But other minor errors - why change the breed of Anastasia's dog - or was it an error? Why get Tatiana's French bulldog's name wrong? Not to mention an orthological error here, a grammatical error there, and the continuous mis-accenting of a French name which any first year French student knows needs an accent grave...sure, these are minor quibbles, but this is a historical novel, and one that claims to hew closely to fact. The author cites all the books she used in her author's notes at the end, and there are quite a few, all of which are pretty solid historical works. She notes how she combined certain historical personages into one character or changed the fate of Anastasia's dog (the likely spaniel [though I've also read it was a Pekingese, which I doubt] died with its owner, but she has the husky live for personal reasons - fair enough, she explains it) - but all in all, the result is that the book, while being a novel, doesn't actually stray far from historical fact. Even some of the dialogue she takes from published letters and diaries. So why get these little things wrong? Didn't anyone at that renowned publishing house (Doubleday) catch it? In the end, even I, the grand skeptic prepared to dismiss this book entirely, decided it didn't matter. Even I, having read every book and article published about the subject since the 1970s, who knew the details, found myself hurtling along with the narrative and actually surprised at the end. How? How could I be surprised by a story I knew the ending to? I'm not sure how to describe it. Perhaps it was just not knowing how the author was going to wind this up. One notices, progressing, that some of the reasons folks believed Anderson was Anastasia gradually are explained...that all makes sense. Yet I still didn't quite know where the author was heading. By this time the misused diacritical marks or number-subject disagreement were no longer creating slight indignation...I just wanted to see how this wrapped up. Of course, the backward timeline for the Anderson character keeps us in "suspense" (even knowing the answer) until her timeline merges with Anastasia's - Anastasia's progresses to July, 1918, and her murder; Anderson's regresses to her fiance's death in the war, giving birth in a refugee camp, being gravely wounded in a munitions factory accident. I knew all this, and yet I felt somehow surprised, and utterly disappointed that, once again, no Romanov survived that Ekaterinburg basement. It was as if, somehow, the book made me hope again - stupidly, yet it still had that effect - that there'd be a different outcome. The afterword said it all: Anderson rationalizing that we "needed [her] to be Anastasia". Then, the fictional framework for the story makes more sense, and I realized that it really was a much better book than I had anticipated. As I was nearing the denouement, I also wondered why - once DNA proved once and for all that Anderson was the Polish factory worker she was always suspected of being, and not a Grand Duchess - no further books or articles were published about her. Peter Kurth's "Anastasia: The Riddle of Anna Anderson" was the definitive work before the DNA testing - not only of Anderson, but of the remains found in 1970 in Russia and publicized in 1991 with glasnost - proved the truth once and for all. Kurth came to believe that Anderson was Anastasia, and it's difficult not to agree. Once the truth was out, Anderson appears only as a footnote in some articles or tomes as the most famous of the many Romanov pretenders. It's interesting that the only book to deal with this fascinating story - perhaps more fascinating now that the truth is known - is this novel. The Author's Notes mentions that she felt Anderson's story was as worthy of telling as Anastasia's, and she has done us a service in partially doing so. I say partially, because we are still looking at Anderson (even knowing the truth, as I said) through Romanov-colored glasses through the book. There have to be living relatives who know something about her early life, who she was before she either perpetrated this grand hoax (or was she convinced she was Anastasia?). The story of one of the greatest frauds (or delusions) of the 20th century certainly deserves to be told. How did she manage to fool even those who should have known better? Did they really just want to believe so badly, like we did? How did she fool handwriting experts and pass that ear-identification in Germany? This is a poor Pole who hobnobbed with royalty and who managed to live on the charity of believing and loyal friends for the rest of her life, passing herself off as Russian royalty. That's worthy of investigation - the supreme human interest story - but no one seems to even have considered it once Anderson's true identity was confirmed. Credit goes to this author who at least saw it, even though she structured the book as a novel and thus still didn't get into the whys and wherefores of Anderson's transformation and their subsequent effects, which take on an entirely new and exciting cast since Kurth et al. reported. The most telling line in the book comes from the lips of the fictionalized Ingrid Bergman, who meets Anderson in preparation for her role in 1956's "Anastasia" (in which the title character was an amnesia victim). Anderson asks Bergman "Do you think I'm lying?" Bergman replies, "I don't care". In the end, the fact Anderson turned out not to be Anastasia is moot for the purposes of this book. We all know that they're not the same person, but in the end, we don't care. Anderson's story is one that deserves to be told especially now that we know who she really was...and it still hasn't been. This novel is the closest to come to it. No wonder the author didn't want to write it but felt she had to. Now, someone, pick up the gauntlet and write the Anderson book that goes on the non-fiction shelf!

## Technical Specifications

| Specification | Value |
|---------------|-------|
| Best Sellers Rank | #9,762 in Books ( See Top 100 in Books ) #11 in Biographical Historical Fiction #18 in Historical Mystery #21 in Biographical & Autofiction |
| Customer Reviews | 4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars (4,337) |
| Dimensions  | 5.13 x 0.96 x 7.95 inches |
| Edition  | Reprint |
| ISBN-10  | 1101973315 |
| ISBN-13  | 978-1101973318 |
| Item Weight  | 10.2 ounces |
| Language  | English |
| Print length  | 448 pages |
| Publication date  | February 5, 2019 |
| Publisher  | Vintage |

## Images

![I Was Anastasia - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81fSaTrwizL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very Intriguing!
*by J***E on March 16, 2026*

I loved the Frozen River so I had to check out more by Ariel Lawton… the author felt called to write this book & that makes it extra special. I appreciate all of the research & intention that went in to formulating the dual timelines. Anna’s going backward & Anastasia's going forward until the end. It was a unique way to tell the story & executed well. I read this in a review before I dove in but I 100% agree… Even if you know how the real life story ends, you really can’t predict how this book ends…It makes you ask questions the whole way through & even after you are done reading, it gives you a new perspective. There are many curiosities we may never know the full answer to but this book gives you a lot to think about. Hang tight & don’t spoil the ending!

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐ No Spoiler Alert Needed
*by M***O on September 20, 2018*

I considered beginning this review with a spoiler alert, but after brief consideration realized that really, none is needed. The logical base for this novel - those Tsar-struck and Romanov groupies among us - know the story well, and, unless one was hiding out in the Lost City of Z for most of the 20th century, there is no way the non-Russophile wouldn't know the tale, either. I am not a fan of fiction - especially historical fiction, where a character-creating author attempts to give speech to people who actually existed, complete with their own speech - so I was prepared to dislike this book (one of the reasons I, one of those aforementioned Romanov groupies, passed over it in the bookstore and bought it used on Amazon). We all know, and have for years, that DNA proved Anna Anderson was not the Grand Duchess. So what could this book present that was at all new and interesting? I began it with pad and paper at hand the moment the Anna character (written in the third person - except for the prologue and afterword - and regressing in time) is defined as being "in her seventies" in 1968. Anastasia would still have been in her 60s. The fact that Anderson is in her seventies is mentioned about three times. I then noticed that the Anastasia portion (written in the first person, normal time sequence) mentions her age a few times - and it is correct. So, was the Anna portion in error, or a subtle way of already letting us know they aren't the same person, almost from the first page? I'm not sure. But other minor errors - why change the breed of Anastasia's dog - or was it an error? Why get Tatiana's French bulldog's name wrong? Not to mention an orthological error here, a grammatical error there, and the continuous mis-accenting of a French name which any first year French student knows needs an accent grave...sure, these are minor quibbles, but this is a historical novel, and one that claims to hew closely to fact. The author cites all the books she used in her author's notes at the end, and there are quite a few, all of which are pretty solid historical works. She notes how she combined certain historical personages into one character or changed the fate of Anastasia's dog (the likely spaniel [though I've also read it was a Pekingese, which I doubt] died with its owner, but she has the husky live for personal reasons - fair enough, she explains it) - but all in all, the result is that the book, while being a novel, doesn't actually stray far from historical fact. Even some of the dialogue she takes from published letters and diaries. So why get these little things wrong? Didn't anyone at that renowned publishing house (Doubleday) catch it? In the end, even I, the grand skeptic prepared to dismiss this book entirely, decided it didn't matter. Even I, having read every book and article published about the subject since the 1970s, who knew the details, found myself hurtling along with the narrative and actually surprised at the end. How? How could I be surprised by a story I knew the ending to? I'm not sure how to describe it. Perhaps it was just not knowing how the author was going to wind this up. One notices, progressing, that some of the reasons folks believed Anderson was Anastasia gradually are explained...that all makes sense. Yet I still didn't quite know where the author was heading. By this time the misused diacritical marks or number-subject disagreement were no longer creating slight indignation...I just wanted to see how this wrapped up. Of course, the backward timeline for the Anderson character keeps us in "suspense" (even knowing the answer) until her timeline merges with Anastasia's - Anastasia's progresses to July, 1918, and her murder; Anderson's regresses to her fiance's death in the war, giving birth in a refugee camp, being gravely wounded in a munitions factory accident. I knew all this, and yet I felt somehow surprised, and utterly disappointed that, once again, no Romanov survived that Ekaterinburg basement. It was as if, somehow, the book made me hope again - stupidly, yet it still had that effect - that there'd be a different outcome. The afterword said it all: Anderson rationalizing that we "needed [her] to be Anastasia". Then, the fictional framework for the story makes more sense, and I realized that it really was a much better book than I had anticipated. As I was nearing the denouement, I also wondered why - once DNA proved once and for all that Anderson was the Polish factory worker she was always suspected of being, and not a Grand Duchess - no further books or articles were published about her. Peter Kurth's "Anastasia: The Riddle of Anna Anderson" was the definitive work before the DNA testing - not only of Anderson, but of the remains found in 1970 in Russia and publicized in 1991 with glasnost - proved the truth once and for all. Kurth came to believe that Anderson was Anastasia, and it's difficult not to agree. Once the truth was out, Anderson appears only as a footnote in some articles or tomes as the most famous of the many Romanov pretenders. It's interesting that the only book to deal with this fascinating story - perhaps more fascinating now that the truth is known - is this novel. The Author's Notes mentions that she felt Anderson's story was as worthy of telling as Anastasia's, and she has done us a service in partially doing so. I say partially, because we are still looking at Anderson (even knowing the truth, as I said) through Romanov-colored glasses through the book. There have to be living relatives who know something about her early life, who she was before she either perpetrated this grand hoax (or was she convinced she was Anastasia?). The story of one of the greatest frauds (or delusions) of the 20th century certainly deserves to be told. How did she manage to fool even those who should have known better? Did they really just want to believe so badly, like we did? How did she fool handwriting experts and pass that ear-identification in Germany? This is a poor Pole who hobnobbed with royalty and who managed to live on the charity of believing and loyal friends for the rest of her life, passing herself off as Russian royalty. That's worthy of investigation - the supreme human interest story - but no one seems to even have considered it once Anderson's true identity was confirmed. Credit goes to this author who at least saw it, even though she structured the book as a novel and thus still didn't get into the whys and wherefores of Anderson's transformation and their subsequent effects, which take on an entirely new and exciting cast since Kurth et al. reported. The most telling line in the book comes from the lips of the fictionalized Ingrid Bergman, who meets Anderson in preparation for her role in 1956's "Anastasia" (in which the title character was an amnesia victim). Anderson asks Bergman "Do you think I'm lying?" Bergman replies, "I don't care". In the end, the fact Anderson turned out not to be Anastasia is moot for the purposes of this book. We all know that they're not the same person, but in the end, we don't care. Anderson's story is one that deserves to be told especially now that we know who she really was...and it still hasn't been. This novel is the closest to come to it. No wonder the author didn't want to write it but felt she had to. Now, someone, pick up the gauntlet and write the Anderson book that goes on the non-fiction shelf!

### ⭐⭐⭐ Interesting but confusing.
*by S***N on March 17, 2026*

Confusing Book. This is an interesting book, however, the author jumps back and forth in time, between the past and the present. Kind of hard to keep track due to that aspect of the book. If you don't mind the back and forth, you might want to read it.

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.tw/products/130415383-i-was-anastasia](https://www.desertcart.tw/products/130415383-i-was-anastasia)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Taiwan*
*Store origin: TW*
*Last updated: 2026-04-24*