DIY Financial Advisor: A Simple Solution to Build and Protect Your Wealth (Wiley Finance)

Here is our full review, previously posted on Gestaltu.com. ----------------------------- We draw a significant amount of inspiration for the material we cover on this blog from the publications of our financial brethren. Unfortunately, given the non-stop firehouse of information that increasingly characterizes the digital age, it’s nearly impossible to consume anything longer than a blog post. So it’s noteworthy that we were inspired to read – cover to cover – Wes Grey, Jack Vogel and David Foulke’s most recent book, DIY Financial Advisor. The book is divided into three distinct themes: the fallibility of experts, the FACTS framework, and the actual DIY investment strategies. On the first theme, the book feels downright comforting in its familiarity. Covering increasingly well-traveled grounds, the aptly named “Part 1: Why You Can Beat The Experts” discusses common themes for In-The-Know investors, such as: -Investors rely far too much on the wrong type of expertise. -Wall Street’s incentives are a horrifying mess that are rarely in alignment with the client. -Humans have numerous evolutionarily-ingrained behavioral biases that often undermine long-term success, and even the most deified experts are subject to the same human foibles. -Narratives are as compelling as they are useless, and can even sometimes spiral out of control to the point of establishing myth as reality. -And because of all the previous points, simplified models have an astounding track record of outperforming “experts.” There is no denying these points. Years ago the research community reached a tipping point on these topics; there’s no going back now. Enlightened investors are simply waiting for society to catch up, and DIY is doing its part to speed the process along. As it so eloquently states: "Here’s the bottom line: everyone makes mistakes. And because we recognize our frequent irrational urges, we often seek the judgment of an expert, to avoid becoming our own worst enemy. We assume that experts, with years of experience in their particular fields, are better equipped and incentivized to make unbiased decisions. But is this assumption valid? A surprisingly robust, but neglected branch of academic literature, has studied, for more than 60 years, the assumption that experts make unbiased decisions. The evidence tells a decidedly one-sided story: Systematic decision making, through the use of simple quantitative models with limited inputs, outperforms discretionary decisions made by experts. We’ll leave the last word to Paul Meehl, the eminent scholar in the field of psychology, “There is no controversy in social science that shows such a large body of qualitatively diverse studies coming out so uniformly in the same direction as this one [models outperform experts].” After laying a solid behavioral foundation, DIY moves onto the second theme: developing a framework for assessing the efficacy of financial strategies. Especially useful for investors currently using a financial adviser, Chapter 5 covers the FACTS method. From the book: "For every investment strategy that needs to be assessed, the FACTS framework (Fees, Access, Complexity, Taxes, and Search) can be employed to clarify important considerations for the prospective investor. Our experience suggests that the vast majority of taxable family offices and high-net-worth individuals should focus on strategies with lower costs, higher accessibility and liquidity, easily understood investment processes, higher tax-efficiency, and limited due diligence requirements. For example, FACTS would suggest, in general, that investors make more use of managed accounts and low-cost passively managed 1940 Act products (ETFs and mutual funds), and fewer private hedge funds and private equity vehicles. Using the FACTS framework can help assess cost/benefit trade-offs across strategy characteristics, which in turn, improves portfolio results net of taxes, fees, and overall brain damage." And then finally, having established the fallibility of experts and a useful framework for assessing investment strategies, DIY moves into a discussion of actual investment methods. We won’t spend the time here going through the details of the various risk management and investment models because…buy the book. But there are a few points that deserve recognition. First, diversification is still the cornerstone of any risk management strategy, but it must be implemented intelligently to maximize benefits. This includes making sure diversifying strategies are qualified through the FACTS framework. But there is no escaping it: you should still eat the free lunch. Second, the authors believe in factor investing, but only at the highest levels of reliability. Because of this, their specific strategy recommendations rely heavily on value and momentum as tools for filtering and weighting portfolio holdings. Wes and Jack are just as passionate about applying factor investing for Tactical asset allocation, especially for the purpose of risk management. Specifically, they recommend simple momentum and moving average filters to step aside from asset classes when there is a risk that they may be trending lower. These methods have been shown to preserve returns while substantially reducing the risk of large losses during bear markets. It’s no secret that we advocate for a similarly active approach to asset allocation. However, we would lodge a minor objection with their assertions about “advanced” allocation strategies. Specifically, Jack and Wes question the utility of mean-variance optimization based largely on studies performed by DeMiguel, Garlappy & Uppal (2009), which show that optimization-based portfolios underperform naive (1/n) portfolios when optimized over rolling 36 month estimation windows. (In an Appendix to the original paper the researchers confirm their original conclusions via a “robustness test” using a lookback window of 60 months). Unfortunately, the DeMiguel et. al. analysis represents a misapplication of factor investing: by using a rolling 3-5 year window to estimate means and covariances, DeMiguel treated the value factor as if it were a momentum factor. We will revisit this issue at length in a future article. But we digress! Truly, our quibbles with DIY’s assertions on optimization are small relative to our overwhelming alignment with the book’s major themes. At the end of the day, investors are well-advised to pay attention to the changes that will have the largest and most immediate impact on their outcomes, and DIY makes those perfectly clear: -Don’t believe the hype on experts, -Assess your options using the FACTS, -Diversify for risk management, and -Harvest persistent factors for risk management and performance. It’s impossible not to endorse such a practical and well-formulated set of principles. Congratulations to the team at Alpha Architect for publishing a book that will find a permanent place on our financial bookshelf.

Firstly, I have been a "registered rep" for 30 years, and have studied the CFA Institute programs in Investment Performance Measurement & Attribution, as well as the main Financial Analysis program. In addition, I have studied the course from BU on Financial Planning. I say that not to boast, but to point out that this is not DIY Financial Planning, (which is much broader) but an excellent book on how to manage existing wealth. Neither is it a great book for "stock picking". The financial markets have changed dramatically in the past decades, with about 1/2 of the market participants now using low/no cost products to invest in financial products. Any client of Fidelity (the example is because that's where I have assets) can buy and sell most of the Blackrock iShares, free. Zero. Not even a flat $5 bucks per trade. The book begins with an explanation of how financial intermediaries incentive is to charge fees- which I guess is necessary, but will be redundant for most readers (I hope). I don't know why Goldman Sachs manages billions of dollars for "smart" investors, in funds which underperform the US indices, even before they charge fees. That baffles me. This book is an invaluable read for anyone who has money now, and would like to make invest decisions for themselves (or at least challenge their existing assumptions and advisors). This book is for everyone who has gone beyond "I want to beat the market" to the point that they understand a little already about the risk/return concepts of asset allocation decisions. If you can describe your own asset allocation in 30 seconds, then you are ready for this book. If not, call these guys and have a conversation!

DIY Financial Advisor is an excellent book that discusses a wide range of topics relevant to investing [e.g, “factors” (particularly value and momentum), trend following, behavioral finance, due diligence of investment managers, etc.]. Some familiarity with financial markets is assumed, but the book can be read and appreciated by a wide audience with varying levels of financial experience and expertise. One particularly valuable feature of the book is that it includes a large number of high quality references at the end of each chapter that allow the reader to dig more deeply into the data supporting key conclusions and, in some cases, develop a more complete and nuanced understanding. It quickly becomes very obvious as one reads DIY Financial Advisor that it was written by individuals who have studied, practiced, and succeeded in both the academic and investment management worlds. Among the more than 20 highly regarded financial/investment books I have read, this is easily one of my favorites.

I'm a professional investor -- an educated audience, if you will, and able to understand all of the content in this book. I do like the way they boil down lots of academic research into simple rules and guidance which in theory could be applied by a "DIY investor". I should emphasize "in theory": in practice, it would somewhat challenging to do what the authors suggest, at least in part because there aren't great ETFs that execute their strategies, and doing it with individual stocks would actually require a level of trading organization that most people wouldn't have time for (to say nothing about lots of complicated and difficult tax issues, as well as transaction costs). In some cases (for the market timing rules) one would have to liquidate ones entire investment portfolio (and realize taxes on everything -- If you happen to live in the Cayman Islands, this book might be more practical) to follow the rules. The authors' own ETFs which help with some of the leg work have extremely high fees (nearly 80 basis points) and are also very small and illiquid. Really this book needs one more chapter, or even potentially another whole book: the practical aspects of actually following their recommendations in taxable and tax free accounts. Still, I learned a few potentially interesting 'investing rules' to add to the tool kit, so for me the book was worth the price I paid for it.

I am somewhat familiar with the work done by the folks at Alpha Architect--I'm a big fan of their research based approach coupled with a firm foundation in behavioral finance. Dr Vogel is a "quant" guy and I find this book to be "elegant." What this means is that there's no fluff and no wasted space. If you want to learn and follow an investing methodology, then this book is for you. The theoretical approach and empirical data are presented in a well organized and easy to read manner. I read this book quickly and I'm going to donate it to my local public library. It deserves attention and has applicability to many of us who manage our own investments. It has my strongest recommendation.

This is full of sensible investment advice and frameworks for making investment decisions, all backed by an impressive collection of empirical research. The questions addressed by the book will appeal to a broad spectrum of investors -- from those who delegate management of their portfolio to an advisor (e.g., how do I assess my financial advisor?) on the one end, to individual stock pickers (e.g., how does a Buffett approach to stock selection stack up against a Ben Graham approach?) on the other. If you enjoy this book, I highly recommend the blog written by the authors at alphaarchitect.com, which is also packed with high quality insights.

Good.

This book is a fantastic resource for any investor looking to gain the education, tools, and confidence to be their own DIY Financial Advisor. I enjoyed the many examples and insights regarding behavioral psychology and investor bias/overconfidence, and liked the easy readability of the book including humorous anecdotes, which were coupled with real models and frameworks (simple and digestable), and fact-based ideas. Highly recommend!

Am a regular reader of the alpha architect blog.Found this book really useful and working on applying these concepts to Indian markets. Also planning to buy the new Quantitative Momentum.

Ich fand das Buch lesenswert. Ich möchte hier nicht auf Details eingehen, Leseprobe herunterladen und Inhaltsverzeichnis durchgehen. Kein langes Blaba sondern komprimiertes Wissen zur Geldanlage.

No exige un nivel avanzado de finanzas pero sí unos conocimientos mínimos. Por lo demás, el libro trata el tema de una manera no excesivamente complicada.

Looking back, I don't know what made me buy this book but I'm very glad that I did. The book argues that the best way to invest is for you and me, as non-financial advisors - to invest our money ourselves following some relatively simple rules that help to identify the shape of the portfolio, the selections within the portfolio and provide risk management to avoid large financial losses in crashes like 2000 and 2008. The part one of the book starts by explaining that experts are subject to the same cognitive biases and irrationalities as a lay-person and sometimes worse because they suffer from over-confidence. It goes on to show how simple investments models can beat experts most of the times and even if the experts are given the model, they are still outperformed by the model. Part 2 of the book goes on to use empirical testing of many years of stock market results to test various suggested portfolio allocations and ideas. It then goes on to look at the way investors can be guided on when they should be in or out of the market. Finally it looks at how using the two proven winning investment strategies of value and momentum can be used to provide superior returns over more general investments. In the past, I have raved about The Permanent Portfolio: Harry Browne's Long-Term Investment Strategy and how it has shaped my thoughts on diversification. However in my review of this buy and hold investment strategy with annual rebalancing, I expressed my concern about investing when the market was close to a top. This is a particular concern when central banks have engaged in unconventional policies of zero interest rates and quantitative easing to destroy honest price discovery in the financial markets. This book with its risk management strategies provides that answer with two methods and one of these is available on popular financial advisor websites for free. Here are the reasons why I haven't given it five stars despite it helping to clarify my thoughts on investment strategy: 1) The fact that the authors have tested the ideas against the market actuals for many years means that there are a scary number of statistical tables that may make the book feel too complicated if you're not mathematically bent. The authors recognise the issue in one chapter where they've written a simplified version that focuses on the results of the tests and a more detailed version which goes deeper into the methodology that I happily skipped. 2) As you get your ideas straight and buy into one method of investing, the book comes along and says "this one is even better"... and then "this one is even better". I felt like I was on a big dipper when I was reading it, thinking I'd reached the top and then another peak arrived which was a bit more complicated and scary. 3) The book is written for the American market so some of the comments regarding tax issues aren't true and the portfolios suggested were more biased to the American market than I think is appropriate for people living in the UK. 4) The book doesn't make any reference to the current investment climate where prices are distorted and where bonds and the stock markets have lost their negation correlations with them both recently at historic peaks. This is quite a difficult book to read. The first section on why you can't trust experts is fascinating and is what you'll see in the Kindle sample. Part 2 is more daunting but together, they will guide you to have confidence that you can manage an investment portfolio without it taking too much of your time each month.

I didn't really enjoy the material in this book. I prefer Gary Antonacci's simpler approach in his title: Dual Momentum.