Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy)

OK

Great inroad to the classical Descartes, and the contemporary Icke. Question everything and be wary of the use(s) of language.

As my title implies, I did not read this very book, but I did read Sextus Empiricus' text, only in a French edition and translation.This text was very important in the history of philosophy and modern thought in that, I believe, it is one of the few "textbooks" of ancient skepticism.Personally, of the three books that constitute the "outlines of Scepticism" (as this here edition has it "Pyrrhonian Outlines would be a better translation, but they have a point in that Pyrrho and the philosophy described by Sextus aren't quite as similar as one would be led to believe) I preferred the first; mainly because the second and third are redundant and not always very reader-friendly. Quite frankly, I spent quite a few pages reading and not understanding a single thing that was said. When Sextus goes on to explain how basically nothing can be despite obvious observations (acknowledged by skeptics), well, I'm not too convinced. But that is still way better than most ancient philosophy which were nice fantasies (sometimes) and which are attacked by Sextus; so I appreciated that.Skepticism is a very interesting philosophical movement, and I wish Pyrrho and Sextus Empiricus were as known as Socrates and Plato (in whose roles they perfectly fit: Pyrrho never wrote anything and Sextus is the one who writes it down in a book).Recommend to anyone who is interested in getting to the texts themselves; but beware of the second and third books: you may want to stick to the first.

Sextus Empiricus reveals the Sceptic m.o. of seeking opposing arguments with equal likelihood, resulting in tranquility of mind resting in indecision. Dogmatists, he states, are the ones who cannot live the blessed life; not finding equilibrium in indecision. Most readers will likely not buy that argument along with quite a few other opposing arguments presented as being equally likely. Empiricus still gives a lot of quality arguments from a unique perspective of thought. The book is a recommended read for its historical and novel thought process. The book is intellectually stimulating and at times even humorous - for example the time when a Cynic debates a Sceptic over motion:"One of the Cynics, when the argument against motion was propounded [from a Sceptic], gave no answer but stood up and walked away, establishing by his action and evidently that motion is real."Not being exposed previously to first hand Sceptic reasoning I was pleasantly surprised by its legitimate ideas and entertainment value. I believe those interested in history and philosophy will also feel the better for reading the book.

This is a classic and priceless work. Along with the other extant works of S.E. it remains virtually the only surviving record of teachings attributed to the very influential 4th c. B.C.E. philosopher Pyrrho of Elis. As such, the book preserves a now largely forgotten body of thought that rivals anything produced in the same vein since. I think there is nothing -- except a lot of multisyllabic obfuscation -- in the works of the phenomenologists, the existentialists, or the usually uneducated and thoughtless so-called "postmodernists" that can't be found in ancient skepticism.I think this particular translation is also the best for most readers. (If you are a serious scholar and can read the Greek yourself, then you are a better judge than I of whether it's a good translation. What I mean is that it is the most accessible for modern readers.) Numerous other translations are available and several are in print. Annas & Barnes, however, both noted classics scholars and both persons who deeply understand and seem sympathetic to the ancient skeptics, have set out a translation very accessible to modern English readers. They have also set out copious notes and cross references that are very useful to more serious readers.The previous reviewer from Colorado, incidentally, is off the mark on a few things. First, I doubt that S.E. was really interested that much in "truth." Though he may sometimes say or imply that that is his aim, I think he does so in a catty or coy way. I think he never thought he was going to find the truth; rather, he knew before he started writing that the skeptic simply cannot be answered -- there is no argument the skeptic cannot pick apart. As S.E. -- a professional doctor -- repeatedly says, skeptical arguments are like a doctor's medicine. They go in and dissolve the patient's illness, and then flow out with it to be disposed of. In other words, the skeptic argues not to discover truth, but only to dissect illusions.Moreover, in the spirit of full disclosure, S.E. is not as timely as the Colorado review implies. S.E. nowhere mentions God, contrary to what the previous review suggests, and is not in this book concerned with scientists as such. Rather, he attacks the prevailing *philosophical* schools of his day, namely the Stoics, the still-lingering corpse of the Academy, and a group he calls the Peripatetics (meaning Aristotelians). This book is largely a technical manual of arguments to be made in response to the arguments of those other groups, which in turn are technical themselves.That is not to say that this is not a fascinating book. For example, how interesting it is that S.E. solves riddles that would so traumatized Sartre and Camus 2000 years later!

Really philosophical but hard to understand.

"Outlines of Scepticism is a great book, and one of the most important to survive from antiquity. But this translation is terrible. The translators are openly hostile. They render the text hard to follow due to a reflexive distaste for book's message. In the introduction Julian Barnes calls the author a "quack" and says his thesis is false.Benson Mates' translation is far superior  The Skeptic Way: Sextus Empiricus' Outlines of Pyrrhonism .

Great quality