fairikabe DisplayPort to USB C Cable 4K 60Hz, 6.6ft Unidirectional DisplayPort Source to USB-C for Touchable Portable Monitor, Nreal Air/Xreal Air, USB-C Monitor, Projector etc.

Works great! I've been using it Heavily with a Pair of Xreal Air glasses on my desktop PC. thanks to this output Converter I can do stuff on the pc in the living room with out needing the tv. It even works with a finicky double female USBC adapter so I can use my original xreal air USBC cord to plug into the glasses. (though sometimes you have to flip the double female adapter around)right now I have it hooked up with a 10ft usbc data extension cable Via a USB-c to USB-c double female(receving male cords) adapter so I can use my glasses on the other side of the room from my ordinary pc's Display output port. It works great. detects signal, and I have used it heavily for months now. I am about to buy the HDMI version so I can use it on other devices that don't have Display output ports.

I bought this cable to use with a Wacom Cintiq Pro 16 tablet (DTH-1620) that I bought second-hand, without the original cables. The cable seemed like exactly what I needed, until I saw that other review stating that it wouldn't provide more that 15 Watts of power.I asked the seller about the power rating. They responded that it should support PD 3.0, so I took a chance and ordered it. Well, it's working just fine! It powers on, gets 4K video at 60Hz, and the pen and touch-screen are functioning!So, the cable supports more than 15W, since I'm pretty sure the screen uses around 25W. I know it's definitely more than 18W because previously I had tried powering the tablet from an 18W power supply and it wouldn't turn on. I can't say for sure why that other reviewer was only getting 15, but from my research there can be a problem if you plug the USB-A plug into a Quick Charge capable port. It seems what happens is the adapter may try to pull power from the QC source instead of the USB-C plug. The order you plug them in might also be part of it. What worked for me was plugging in the DisplayPort 1st, the shorter USB-C to the power supply 2nd, USB-A to the PC 3rd, then attaching the longer USB-C to the tablet last.Another thing that can limit the wattage is the power supply. The ones with multiple ports usually divide up the power across them, and not always equally. So, it matters which one you plug into and how many total are in use. For example on the one I'm using, an AMLINK 65W 3-Port USB-C Charger (CW143), if all 3 are in use, Port 1 gets 45W while Ports 2&3 only get 15W.I'm quite happy with this cable so far. I wouldn't mind if the shorter USB-C cable was a bit longer, though. I had to scoot my PC a little closer to the wall to reach the charger. It and the USB-A cable are only about 20" long. The longer USB-C is about 77". The cable itself seems durable enough and it didn't get hot while in use, so that's good. I'll update this if I have any problems with it in the future.

Why the hell are there so few options for hooking up a graphics card to a touchscreen portable monitor? Like I understand it's a niche, but there should be more cables that can split a USB C signal into power, data, and video. There's like maybe three or four options and this was one of two that didn't exclude power or data. I absolutely love this cable, the only that that could make it better is if it was braided and came in different lengths. The USB C power cable could also stand to be longer since it's not going to the PC, but I just got and extension cable for it. I'm using this cable to run a portable monitor that's 18in, 1440p, 144hz, 16:10 aspect ratio, touchscreen. All of that across a single USB C cable. If you need to do what I did, buy this cable, it does exactly what it says it does, no caveats.

I bought this specifically because I wanted to use an RTX 30 or 40 Series card with a USB-C monitor, which also has a USB hub, but the trouble is that only the RTX 20 Series (or laptops) have USB-C outputs that support this particular feature. (Yes, I could just run two separate cables, but I don't want to.) Well, this works flawlessly, with one tiny exception: this is only just over six feet long. Not a deal breaker for me, as I have several give-or-take ten/fifteen-feet USB-C cables, and using a C-to-C coupler, that seems to work fine. Presently, I have around twenty-one feet of cable, including a coupler, running 2560x1600@144hz with HDR, and with full USB 2.0 capabilities, over DisplayPort>USB-C, with both extra heads plugged into respective sockets. The main issue is that this requires a pretty hefty USB-C power supply, so I'm using one that can go up to 12v, not the motherboard's USB-C (which I think this particular Motherboard predates USB-C). A pass-through device I have plugged in directly to said monitor says its running at around 10.3v, 1.12a, for around 11w, and that's only going to go up, as I demand more from it.Given that this is plugged into the DisplayPort, I'm not worried at all about the voltage possibly damaging my video card, computer, or monitor. USB power over DP or HDMI should be completely safe, due to the necessity that those standards require a strict signaling voltage, without the option to backfeed voltage. (as I understand it, DP is 3.3v, HDMI is 5v; USB-C, using DP-Alt Mode is likely also 3.3v). I did once blow out a PS3's USB ports, but only the power part, as long as I use a hub that requires external power, it still works; but I don't want to make that mistake again.I'm nothing if not spoiled for choice, but something appeals to me about being able to stretch a single USB-C cable around a room and still get high resolution and framerate, with the option for using my existing USB devices, and not having to resort to wireless. I understand that wireless is "more convenient" or "better now than in years prior", but I like a simple solution to a specific problem. This cable solves my specific problem. At present, though, this is just an experiment for me, and won't get to be implemented until much later.

I was dreading have to redundantly plug 2 USB-C cables into my portable monitor for my desktop PC. Although I would've preferred a lower price tag, it's great reducing the connection to one wire on the monitor-side. I didn't plug in the USB-A cable since it's for touch-screens.